From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cty. of N.Y. v. Plaskett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2007
40 A.D.3d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 929.

May 1, 2007.

Determination of respondent Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings, dated September 8, 2005, which directed petitioner Police Department to return to respondent Beverly Plaskett a vehicle seized incident to the arrest of respondent Gregory Plaskett, unanimously confirmed, the petition denied and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Martin Shulman, J.], entered December 8, 2005) dismissed, without costs.

Michael A. Cardozo, Corporation Counsel, New York (Julie Steiner of counsel), for petitioner.

The Legal Aid Society, New York (Steven B. Wasserman of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Marlow, J.P., Nardelli, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Malone, JJ.


The finding of the Office of Administrative Trials and Hearings that Beverly Plaskett was an innocent owner is supported by substantial evidence ( see Property Clerk, N.Y. City Police Dept. v Pagano, 170 AD2d 30, 36).


Summaries of

Cty. of N.Y. v. Plaskett

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 2007
40 A.D.3d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Cty. of N.Y. v. Plaskett

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of PROPERTY CLERK OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT OF THE CITY OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 2007

Citations

40 A.D.3d 231 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 3774
833 N.Y.S.2d 385

Citing Cases

Prop. Clerk, N.Y.C. Police Dep't v. Leon

Property Clerk, perhaps mindful of Iliana's posture as an innocent owner and her significant property…

PROP. CLERK, N.Y.C. P.D. v. LEON

Property Clerk, perhaps mindful of Iliana's posture as an innocent owner and her significant property…