More to the point, Ohio courts have sustained facial procedural due process challenges where the General Assembly omitted procedural safeguards from legislation, thus refuting the notion that the General Assembly has no duty to include procedural safeguards within legislation. See, e.g., State v. Cowan, 103 Ohio St.3d 144, 2004-Ohio-4777, 814 N.E.2d 846, ¶ 8 (statute that allowed the state to classify dogs as vicious or dangerous animals facially violated procedural due process for providing no preclassification hearing); CT Ohio Portsmouth, LLC v. Ohio Dept. of Medicaid, 2020-Ohio-5091, 161 N.E.3d 803, ¶ 49-52 (10th Dist.) (statute that allowed the state to deprive nursing facilities of their right to participate in Ohio's Medicaid Program facially violated procedural due process when it failed to provide detailed procedures for predeprivation proceedings).