From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 28, 1984
447 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Opinion

No. 83-1893.

March 28, 1984.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, Otis Farrington, J.

John G. Fletcher, South Miami, and Steven L. Josias, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Marion E. Sibley of Sibley, Giblin, Levenson Glaser, Miami Beach, and Ira M. Elegant of Buchbinder Elegant, P.A., Miami, for appellees.


Our review of the record satisfies us that the actions of the appellant caused appellees to prepare additional sheets and supplements to their plans in an effort to meet appellant's objections. Such actions amounted to a change in circumstances which necessitated the trial court's action in entering its interim order which extended the time for compliance with the final judgment granting an injunction. We find that the trial judge acted properly and within his discretion. See, Jackson Grain Co. et al. v. Lee, 150 Fla. 232, 7 So.2d 143 (1942).

Accordingly, we affirm the trial court's order.

AFFIRMED.

HURLEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Mar 28, 1984
447 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)
Case details for

City of Hallandale v. Acmar Engineering Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CITY OF HALLANDALE, APPELLANT, v. ACMAR ENGINEERING CORP., ETC., ET AL.…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Mar 28, 1984

Citations

447 So. 2d 454 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1984)

Citing Cases

Security Management Corp. v. Markham

(3) City of Hallandale v. Farrington, No. 83-2132 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984) (summarily denied by order of court).…