CSP Techs., Inc. v. Clariant Corp.

Full title: CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. CLARIANT CORPORATION, Appellee

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 8, 2016

2015-2062 (Fed. Cir. Dec. 8, 2016)

Opinion

2015-2062

12-08-2016

CSP TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellant v. CLARIANT CORPORATION, Appellee

JOHN LLOYD ABRAMIC, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD NUTTALL, KATHERINE H. JOHNSON. SEAN M. SULLIVAN, Lee Sullivan Shea & Smith LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOHN DAN SMITH III; PAULA FRITSCH, PAUL HENRY BERGHOFF, McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff, LLP, Chicago, IL.

PER CURIAM

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal Board in No. IPR2014-00375.

JUDGMENT

JOHN LLOYD ABRAMIC, Steptoe & Johnson, LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellant. Also represented by JAMES RICHARD NUTTALL, KATHERINE H. JOHNSON. SEAN M. SULLIVAN, Lee Sullivan Shea & Smith LLP, Chicago, IL, argued for appellee. Also represented by JOHN DAN SMITH III; PAULA FRITSCH, PAUL HENRY BERGHOFF, McDonnell, Boehnen, Hulbert & Berghoff, LLP, Chicago, IL. THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (MOORE, REYNA, and TARANTO, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT December 8, 2016

Date

/s/ Peter R. Marksteiner

Peter R. Marksteiner

Clerk of Court