From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruzado v. Washington

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 23, 2023
2:22-cv-1474 (W.D. Wash. May. 23, 2023)

Opinion

2:22-cv-1474

05-23-2023

ANGEL LUIS CRUZADO, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO AMEND COMPLAINT

Jamal N. Whitehead United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Amend Complaint. Dkt. No. 14. No party has opposed the Motion. See LCR 7(b)(2) (“[I]f a party fails to file papers in opposition to a motion, such failure may be considered by the court as an admission that the motion has merit.”). Having reviewed the Complaint, Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Amend Complaint with its accompanying documents, this Court finds good cause exists to grant the motion. It is hereby ORDERED:

1. That Plaintiff's motion is granted;

2. That Plaintiff file a clean version of the proposed amended Complaint within 14 days of this Order;

3. That City of Seattle will have 21 days after the service of summons to respond to the Amended Complaint.


Summaries of

Cruzado v. Washington

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
May 23, 2023
2:22-cv-1474 (W.D. Wash. May. 23, 2023)
Case details for

Cruzado v. Washington

Case Details

Full title:ANGEL LUIS CRUZADO, Plaintiff, v. STATE OF WASHINGTON, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: May 23, 2023

Citations

2:22-cv-1474 (W.D. Wash. May. 23, 2023)