From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruzado v. Rogers

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 15, 2021
C21-1071 MJP (W.D. Wash. Dec. 15, 2021)

Opinion

C21-1071 MJP

12-15-2021

ANGEL LUIS CRUZADO, Plaintiff, v. MELISSA ROGERS, NANCY WEIL, Defendants.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

MARSHA J. PECHMAN UNITED STATES SENIOR DISTRICT JUDGE

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to respond to the two pending motions to dismiss. (Dkt. No. 25.) The Court GRANTS the motion.

Defendants have filed motions to dismiss, which are noted for December 17, 2021. (Dkt. Nos. 18, 21.) Plaintiff is pro se and filed a motion for the appointment of counsel on November 29, 2021, also noted for December 17, 2021. (Dkt. No. 24.) Plaintiff then filed the instant motion for an extension of time on December 2, 2021 and explained that, in addition to his request for counsel, he has had a medical family emergency. (Dkt. No. 25.) Respondents do not oppose the motion for an extension of time but request the noting date to be January 21, 2022 or earlier. (Dkt. Nos. 27, 29.) Although the motion for an extension of time does not note until December 17, 2021, it is ripe for consideration now because there is no opposition. The Court GRANTS Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to respond. Defendants' motions to dismiss (Dkt. Nos. 18, 21) are re-noted to January 21, 2022. Plaintiff's response is due January 17, 2022. See LCR 7(d)(3).

The clerk is ordered to provide copies of this order to all counsel.


Summaries of

Cruzado v. Rogers

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Dec 15, 2021
C21-1071 MJP (W.D. Wash. Dec. 15, 2021)
Case details for

Cruzado v. Rogers

Case Details

Full title:ANGEL LUIS CRUZADO, Plaintiff, v. MELISSA ROGERS, NANCY WEIL, Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Dec 15, 2021

Citations

C21-1071 MJP (W.D. Wash. Dec. 15, 2021)