From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruzado v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 1, 2012
3:11-cv-00522-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Aug. 1, 2012)

Opinion

3:11-cv-00522-RCJ-WGC

08-01-2012

ABRAHAM CRUZADO, Plaintiff, v. DARREN BAKER, et al., Defendants.

COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING


MINUTES OF THE COURT

PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING

MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:

Before the court is defendants' Motion for Enlargement. (Doc. #22.) Therein the defendants seek an extension of fourteen (14) days from any ruling by the court on plaintiff's motions (Docs. #12 and #18) to respond to plaintiff's complaint. (Id.)

In view of the court's granting plaintiff's motion to withdraw his motion to amend his complaint (Doc. #18), and good cause appearing, defendants' motion (Doc. #22) is GRANTED. The defendants shall have up to and including August 15, 2012, within which to respond to plaintiff's complaint (Doc. #7).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK

By: _____________

Deputy Clerk


Summaries of

Cruzado v. Baker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA
Aug 1, 2012
3:11-cv-00522-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Aug. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Cruzado v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:ABRAHAM CRUZADO, Plaintiff, v. DARREN BAKER, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

3:11-cv-00522-RCJ-WGC (D. Nev. Aug. 1, 2012)