From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 17, 2022
345 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D22-1513

08-17-2022

Jorge Cerrito CRUZ, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Jorge Cerrito Cruz, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Jorge Cerrito Cruz, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, and Trisha Meggs Pate, Bureau Chief, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

Because the trial court has ruled on the filing pending below, the Court denies the petition for writ of mandamus as moot. See Ward v. State , 770 So. 2d 206, 207 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (denying a petition for writ of mandamus as moot where the trial court had ruled on the motion pending below).

B.L. Thomas, Ray, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cruz v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Aug 17, 2022
345 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Cruz v. State

Case Details

Full title:Jorge Cerrito CRUZ, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Aug 17, 2022

Citations

345 So. 3d 405 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)