From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. Princeton Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 29, 2008
950 A.2d 269 (Pa. 2008)

Opinion

No. 364 EAL 2007 — 365 EAL 2007.

May 29, 2008.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 364-365 EAL 2007 from the Order of the Superior Court.

Prior Report: Pa.Super., 925 A.2d 853.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 29th day of May 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED and the Superior Court's decision is REVERSED in part to the extent it holds that there was no genuine issue of material fact regarding whether the use of the process was primarily used for a purpose for which it was not designed. See Winter v. Pa. Emp. Benefit Trust Fund, 595 Pa. 627, 939 A.2d 843 (2007); see also McNeil v. Jordan, 586 Pa. 413, 894 A.2d 1260 (2006). Further, this matter is REMANDED to the Superior Court for consideration of the harm element of McNeil, 894 A.2d at 1275.

Justice TODD did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Cruz v. Princeton Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
May 29, 2008
950 A.2d 269 (Pa. 2008)
Case details for

Cruz v. Princeton Insurance Co.

Case Details

Full title:Jacqueline Nieves CRUZ and Oscar Cruz, Petitioners v. PRINCETON INSURANCE…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Date published: May 29, 2008

Citations

950 A.2d 269 (Pa. 2008)
950 A.2d 269

Citing Cases

Bobrick Corporation v. Santana Products, Inc.

Indeed, there are no averments pertaining to the course of settlement negotiations. This is not a case like…