From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. Pirrone

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 5, 2024
No. 23-CV-05205-WHO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2024)

Opinion

23-CV-05205-WHO

08-05-2024

JONATHAN CRUZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TIM PIRRONE, et al., Defendants.


Re: Dkt. No. 30

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

William H. Orrick, United States District Judge

On July 2, 2024 Magistrate Judge Alex G. Tse issued a Report and Recommendation, recommending that this case be dismissed without prejudice under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 30. Plaintiffs have not filed an objection or other response to the Report and Recommendation, and the deadline to object or respond has passed.

Having reviewed the Report and Recommendation, as well as the full record in this case, I ADOPT the Report and Recommendation in full. Plaintiffs repeatedly missed deadlines set by Judge Tse, and their complaint admittedly suffered from numerous deficiencies. See Dkt. Nos. 18, 24, 28, 29. Most recently, plaintiffs did not object to the Report and Recommendation or file any response indicating they desired to proceed with this litigation.

In light of all of the above, this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 41(b). The Clerk shall close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cruz v. Pirrone

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Aug 5, 2024
No. 23-CV-05205-WHO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2024)
Case details for

Cruz v. Pirrone

Case Details

Full title:JONATHAN CRUZ, et al., Plaintiffs, v. TIM PIRRONE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Aug 5, 2024

Citations

No. 23-CV-05205-WHO (N.D. Cal. Aug. 5, 2024)