From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. Knowles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2012)

Opinion

1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC)

02-27-2012

OSCAR CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Defendants.

Kelli M. Hammond KELLI M. HAMMOND Attorney for Defendants Manu Pradhan MANU PRADHAN Attorney for Plaintiffs


KAMALA D. HARRIS, State Bar No. 146672

Attorney General of California

MONICA N. ANDERSON, State Bar No. 182970

Supervising Deputy Attorney General

KELLI M. HAMMOND, State Bar No. 217485

Deputy Attorney General

Attorneys for Defendants

Chrones, Harrington, Knowles and Frauenheim

STIPULATION OF THE PARTIES

STIPULATION

Due to a family emergency, counsel for Defendants was out of the office February 23 and 24, 2012, and will not return to the office until Monday, February 27, 2012. For this reason, the parties, by and through counsel of record, stipulate to a one-day extension of time for the Defendants to file their Opposition to Motion to Compel Further Discovery Responses. Defendants' opposition will be due Monday, February 27, 2012.

Kelli M. Hammond

____________________________

KELLI M. HAMMOND

Attorney for Defendants

Manu Pradhan

____________________________

MANU PRADHAN

Attorney for Plaintiffs

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dennis L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Cruz v. Knowles

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION
Feb 27, 2012
1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2012)
Case details for

Cruz v. Knowles

Case Details

Full title:OSCAR CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. MIKE KNOWLES, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION

Date published: Feb 27, 2012

Citations

1:08-CV-00237-LJO-DLB (PC) (E.D. Cal. Feb. 27, 2012)