From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. Horels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 26, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0045 WBS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0045 WBS KJM P.

February 26, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On December 17, 2007, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed December 17, 2007, are adopted in full;

2. Respondents' June 8, 2007 motion to dismiss is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed without prejudice to petitioner filing another action under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 with respect to the convictions at issue in this action once direct review is complete.


Summaries of

Cruz v. Horels

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 26, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0045 WBS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2008)
Case details for

Cruz v. Horels

Case Details

Full title:JEROME E. CRUZ, Petitioner, v. ROBERT HORELS, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 26, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0045 WBS KJM P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 26, 2008)