From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 27, 2006
164 F. App'x 630 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

Submitted Jan. 23, 2006.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Carolyn E. Reinholdt, Esq., San Francisco, CA, for Petitioner.

Ronald E. Lefevre, Chief Counsel, Office of the District Counsel, Department of Homeland Security, San Francisco, CA; M. Jocelyn Lopez Wright, Esq., Larry P. Cote, DOJ--U.S. Department of Justice Civil Div./Office of Immigration Lit., Washington, DC, for Respondent.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals. Agency No. A72-140-418.

Before: T.G. NELSON, SILVERMAN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Respondent's motion for summary disposition is granted because the questions raised by this petition for review are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Petitioner does not

Page 631.

dispute that he failed to file a motion to reconsider within 30 days after the Board of Immigration Appeals's dismissal of his appeal. See 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(b)(2); Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1258 (9th Cir.1996). Accordingly, this petition for review is denied.

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.


Summaries of

Cruz v. Gonzales

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 27, 2006
164 F. App'x 630 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

Cruz v. Gonzales

Case Details

Full title:Carlos Danilo Urias CRUZ, Petitioner, v. Alberto R. GONZALES, Attorney…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 27, 2006

Citations

164 F. App'x 630 (9th Cir. 2006)