finding "bite and hold" did not constitute the use of deadly force when apprehending a fleeing suspect
Summary of this case from KUHA v. CITY OF MINNETONKANo. 98-41.
October 5, 1998.
C.A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied. Reported below: 139 F. 3d 659.
finding "bite and hold" did not constitute the use of deadly force when apprehending a fleeing suspect
Summary of this case from KUHA v. CITY OF MINNETONKAfinding "bite and hold" did not constitute the use of deadly force when apprehending a fleeing suspect
Summary of this case from Kuha v. City of Minnetonkaaffirming summary judgement for defendant when plaintiff's belief that employee was disabled, as defined by the ADA, was not reasonable
Summary of this case from Keeler v. Florida Department of HealthFull title:VERA CRUZ v. CITY OF ESCONDIDO
Court:U.S.
Date published: Oct 5, 1998
"Retaliation claims are treated the same whether brought under the ADA or Title VII." Penny v. United Parcel…
LaFontaine v. Commissioner of Correctional ServicesThe Court of Appeals affirmed in an unpublished Summary Order filed on March 30, 1998. LaFontaine v. Comm'r…