From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz v. 32BJ SEIU

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 29, 2022
19-CV-11836 (LGS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2022)

Opinion

19-CV-11836 (LGS)(SN)

03-29-2022

CARINA CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. 32BJ SEIU, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

SARAH NETBURN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

The Court has received Plaintiffs March 25, 2022 letter regarding the video recording of her deposition. ECF No. 188. Plaintiff claims that her pro bono counsel, who appeared to defend her deposition, sent such a video recording to Defendants, but that she does not have the video herself. Exhibit 1 to the letter contains Plaintiffs counter-statement to Defendants' Rule 56.1 Statement. See ECF No. 188-1.

The Court interprets Plaintiffs letter as a request that the Court order Defendants to produce the video recording of her deposition. By March 30, 2022, Defendants are to file a letter confirming that they have produced to Plaintiff a video recording of her deposition or that it does not exist. Defendants shall also provide Plaintiff with a transcript of the deposition.

Additionally, by April 1, 2022, Plaintiff shall file a letter confirming whether she intended Exhibit 1 to serve as the entirety of her opposition to Defendants' motion for summary judgment, or whether she plans to file a memorandum of law or any other additional document.

SO ORDERED. 1


Summaries of

Cruz v. 32BJ SEIU

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Mar 29, 2022
19-CV-11836 (LGS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Cruz v. 32BJ SEIU

Case Details

Full title:CARINA CRUZ, Plaintiff, v. 32BJ SEIU, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Mar 29, 2022

Citations

19-CV-11836 (LGS)(SN) (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 29, 2022)