From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruz-Rivera v. T-Mobile

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Sep 19, 2022
1:21-cv-213-AW-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Sep. 19, 2022)

Opinion

1:21-cv-213-AW-GRJ

09-19-2022

ROBERT CRUZ-RIVERA, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE, et al., Defendants.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

ALLEN WINSOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

The magistrate judge issued a report and recommendation, concluding that the court should dismiss without prejudice Plaintiff's claims against two purported T-Mobile employees. ECF No. 47. No party has objected.

Plaintiff had many opportunities to serve those defendants-or to at least provide their addresses so that the United States Marshal could serve-but Plaintiff has not done so. Thus, I agree with the magistrate judge that dismissal is appropriate.

The report and recommendation (ECF No. 47) is adopted and incorporated into this order. The claims against Abby McNally and Mark Hess are dismissed without prejudice, and the clerk will terminate them as defendants in this case. The magistrate judge will conduct further appropriate proceedings.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Cruz-Rivera v. T-Mobile

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Sep 19, 2022
1:21-cv-213-AW-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Sep. 19, 2022)
Case details for

Cruz-Rivera v. T-Mobile

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT CRUZ-RIVERA, Plaintiff, v. T-MOBILE, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Sep 19, 2022

Citations

1:21-cv-213-AW-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Sep. 19, 2022)