Cruz-Manjarrez v. City of Portland

Full title: RICK CRUZ-MANJARREZ, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PORTLAND, OFFICER GORE, OFFICER…

Court: United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Sep 4, 2007

04-CV-1811-AS (D. Or. Sep. 4, 2007)

Opinion

04-CV-1811-AS.

September 4, 2007

RICK CRUZ-MANJARREZ, Beaverton, OR, Plaintiff, Pro Se.

LINDA MENG, City Attorney, J. SCOTT MOEDE, Deputy City Attorney, Portland, OR, Attorneys for Defendants.

ORDER

ANNA BROWN, District JudgePage 2

Magistrate Judge Donald Ashmanskas issued Findings and Recommendation (#82) on July 27, 2007, in which he recommended the Court grant Defendants' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment and to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (#76) and dismiss this matter. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9^th Cir. 1983). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8^th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas's Findings and Recommendation (#82), GRANTS Defendants' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment and to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim (#76), and DISMISSES this matter.

IT IS SO ORDERED.