From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crunk v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 11, 1912
119 P. 1129 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)

Opinion

No. A-933.

Opinion Filed January 11, 1912.

Appeal from District Court, Stephens County; Frank M. Bailey, Judge.

Dock Crunk was convicted of larceny of domestic animals, and appeals. Affirmed.

Womack Brown, for plaintiff in error.

Smith C. Matson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.


Plaintiff in error was convicted at the April, 1910, term of the district court of Stephens county on a charge of larceny of domestic animals, and his punishment fixed at one year in the state penitentiary. The appeal was filed in this court on the 7th day of July, 1910. No briefs have been filed and no appearance made for oral argument on behalf of plaintiff in error. The Attorney General has moved to affirm the judgment for want of prosecution. The motion is sustained and the judgment is affirmed. The clerk will issue the mandate forthwith.


Summaries of

Crunk v. State

Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma
Jan 11, 1912
119 P. 1129 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)
Case details for

Crunk v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOCK CRUNK v. STATE

Court:Criminal Court of Appeals of Oklahoma

Date published: Jan 11, 1912

Citations

119 P. 1129 (Okla. Crim. App. 1912)
119 P. 1129