From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crumwell v. Earle D. Vandekar of Knightsbridge, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 23, 2022
21-CV-9490 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. May. 23, 2022)

Opinion

21-CV-9490 (JPO)

05-23-2022

DENISE CRUMWELL, Plaintiff, v. EARLE D. VANDEKAR OF KNIGHTSBRIDGE, INC., Defendant.


ORDER

J. PAUL OETKEN, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendant was served on December 2, 2021. However, no appearance has been entered on Defendant's behalf, and no response to the complaint has been filed in the allotted time. Plaintiff has not moved for a default judgment.

Plaintiff is directed to notify the Court whether it intends to move for default judgment, or if it has received any communication from Defendant or its counsel regarding a response to the complaint.

If Plaintiff fails by June 7, 2022, to either (1) file a letter concerning the status of the case, or (2) move for default judgment against Defendant, the action may be dismissed for failure to prosecute.

Plaintiff is directed to serve a copy of this order by mail on Defendant.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Crumwell v. Earle D. Vandekar of Knightsbridge, Inc.

United States District Court, S.D. New York
May 23, 2022
21-CV-9490 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. May. 23, 2022)
Case details for

Crumwell v. Earle D. Vandekar of Knightsbridge, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:DENISE CRUMWELL, Plaintiff, v. EARLE D. VANDEKAR OF KNIGHTSBRIDGE, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: May 23, 2022

Citations

21-CV-9490 (JPO) (S.D.N.Y. May. 23, 2022)