From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crumpton v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jan 18, 1934
152 So. 220 (Ala. 1934)

Opinion

5 Div. 173.

January 18, 1934.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Chilton County; F. Loyd Tate, Judge.

Lawrence F. Gerald, of Clanton, for appellant.

In pleading a contract, the contract should be set forth or the legal effect thereof should be fully and fairly averred. 8 C. J. 434, 929; McGowin L. Co. v. Camp Lbr. Co., 192 Ala. 35, 68 So. 263. Where an attempt is made in a bill to redeem to excuse failure of tender of payments of amount due under the mortgage, the facts constituting the excuse should be fully averred as facts and not by way of conclusion of the pleader. Francis v. White, 160 Ala. 523, 49 So. 334; Id., 142 Ala. 590, 39 So. 174; Adams v. Sayre, 76 Ala. 509; Southside Bank v. Daniel, 221 Ala. 327, 128 So. 779; Hart v. Jackson St. Baptist Church, 224 Ala. 64, 139 So. 88.

Reynolds Reynolds, of Clanton, for appellee.

In averring a contract or agreement, it is permissible to aver its legal effect. The bill is sufficient as to this. Mayor, etc., of Ensley v. Hollingsworth Co., 170 Ala. 396, 54 So. 95, Ann. Cas. 1912D, 652. The averments of the bills are sufficient to excuse tender. Southside Bank v. Daniel, 221 Ala. 327, 128 So. 779. If the foreclosure was invalid as averred, appellee was not required to make tender. Randolph v. Bradford, 204 Ala. 378, 86 So. 39.


This bill is filed by the heir at law of the deceased mortgagor, Prentice Campbell.

One aspect of the bill is to set aside an alleged foreclosure on the ground that it was made before the debt secured by the mortgage matured. A copy of the mortgage is not made exhibit to the bill, nor does the bill allege when the debt under the terms of the mortgage matured.

The bill does aver "that on or about January 30, 1931, the respondent for a valuable consideration agreed in writing to extend and carry the balance due under said mortgage until November 1st, 1931; * * * that the respondent, through her attorney, advertised said real estate securing said mortgage for sale under the power of said mortgage and that said real estate was sold on October 31st, 1931, at the courthouse door of Chilton County, Alabama, to the respondent, Blossom Crumpton, at and for the purchase price of $1500.00, and complainant avers that said property conveyed in said mortgage was sold contrary to the agreement of the respondent and said mortgage was foreclosed and the real estate sold prior to the due date of said mortgage and prior to the mortgage becoming due by virtue of said agreement between the respondent and the said mortgagor, Prentice Campbell."

The bill then avers that Prentice Campbell died intestate on or about the month of September, 1930. This was prior to the date of the alleged extension agreement.

While it is permissible in pleading a contract to state its substance and legal effect, the averments must show a binding obligation. McGowin Lumber Export Co. v. R. J. B. F. Camp Lumber Co., 192 Ala. 35, 68 So. 263; Doullut Williams v. Hoffman Co., 204 Ala. 33, 86 So. 73; 13 C. J. p. 715, § 829; Mayor and Aldermen of City of Ensley v. J. E. Hollingsworth Co., 170 Ala. 396, 54 So. 95.

Another aspect of the bill was to enforce the statutory right of redemption, and does not aver a tender of the amount necessary to redeem, but, to excuse such tender, the bill avers that the statement furnished to complainant on his demand "was exorbitant, unreasonable and does not properly, legally and in an intelligible manner set out such debt and lawful charges, and the same contains claims of amounts legally in excess of any amounts that may be legally due under said mortgage."

These averments do not meet the requirements of good pleading. Ewing v. First Nat. Bank of Montgomery et al. (Ala. Sup.) 148 So. 836; Slaughter v. Webb, 205 Ala. 334, 87 So. 854; Dorrough v. Barnett, 216 Ala. 599, 114 So. 198; Cummings v. Vann, 215 Ala. 488, 111 So. 229.

227 Ala. 46.

The demurrers to the bill in both of its aspects were well taken. The decree of the circuit court is therefore reversed, and a decree here rendered sustaining the demurrers, with leave to complainant to amend within twenty days from the filing of the mandate of this court in the office of the register of the circuit court of Chilton county.

Reversed, rendered, and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crumpton v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Alabama
Jan 18, 1934
152 So. 220 (Ala. 1934)
Case details for

Crumpton v. Campbell

Case Details

Full title:CRUMPTON v. CAMPBELL

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Jan 18, 1934

Citations

152 So. 220 (Ala. 1934)
152 So. 220

Citing Cases

American Life Ins. Co. of Alabama v. Carlton

The complaint in a contract action must allege every fact material to the cause of action to show the…

State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co. v. McClendon

Section 12 of Title 28 of the Code places the injured party in the position of the insured, but does not…