From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crump v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Nov 20, 2001
60 S.W.3d 47 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

No. ED 78873

November 20, 2001

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MARION COUNTY, HON. ROBERT M. CLAYTON, JUDGE.

Rosalynn Koch, Assistant Public Defender, Columbia, MO, for Appellant.

Jeremiah W. (Jay) Nixon, Atty. Gen., John M. Morris III, Asst. Atty. Gen. Jefferson City, MO, for Respondent.

Before Sherri B. Sullivan, P.J., Lawrence G. Crahan, J., and Lawrence E. Mooney, J.



ORDER


Michael Crump (Movant) appeals from a judgment denying his request for post-conviction relief under Rule 29.15 following an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims ineffective assistance of trial counsel for failing to move to dismiss the information against Movant. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court's judgment is not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2001, unless otherwise indicated.


Summaries of

Crump v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four
Nov 20, 2001
60 S.W.3d 47 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Crump v. State

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL CRUMP, Movant/Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Defendant/Respondent

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Four

Date published: Nov 20, 2001

Citations

60 S.W.3d 47 (Mo. Ct. App. 2001)