Crump v. O'Campo

Full title: STEVE CRUMP, Plaintiff, v. A. O'CAMPO, Defendant.

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Jun 28, 2021

2:20-cv-2343 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Jun. 28, 2021)

Opinion

2:20-cv-2343 JAM KJN P

06-28-2021

STEVE CRUMP, Plaintiff, v. A. O'CAMPO, Defendant.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE RESPONSIVE PLEADING

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. The Court, having considered defendant Ocampo's request for an extension of time to file a responsive pleading, and good cause having been found:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Defendant's motion for extension (ECF No. 52) is granted; and

2. The responsive pleading date is stayed until thirty-days after the court rules on defendant's motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis privilege.