From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crump v. Hyatt Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 21, 2021
4:20-cv-00295-HSG (N.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)

Opinion

4:20-cv-00295-HSG

09-21-2021

CHRISTINE CRUMP, individually, and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated and on behalf of other aggrieved employees pursuant to the California Private Attorneys General Act, Plaintiff, v. HYATT CORPORATION, an unknown business entity; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, Defendants.


Complaint Filed: December 6, 2019

FAC Filed: August 5, 2020

ORDER (AS MODIFIED) GRANTING STIPULATION TO VACATE CLASS CERTIFICATION REPLY AND HEARING DATE

HON. HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

ORDER

Plaintiff Christine Crump (“Plaintiff) and Defendant Hyatt Corporation (“Defendant”) have submitted a Stipulation To Vacate Class Certification Reply And Hearing Date (Dkt. 52). Having reviewed the Stipulation and finding good cause exists for the relief requested therein, the Court GRANTS the Stipulation and hereby vacates the class certification briefing schedule and hearing date set forth in the Court's Order (Dkt. 50).

The Court further DIRECTS the parties to file by September 28, 2021, a joint status report of no more than two pages notifying the Court when they anticipate filing the motion for preliminary approval in light of the parties' successful settlement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Crump v. Hyatt Corp.

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Sep 21, 2021
4:20-cv-00295-HSG (N.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)
Case details for

Crump v. Hyatt Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTINE CRUMP, individually, and on behalf of other members of the…

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Sep 21, 2021

Citations

4:20-cv-00295-HSG (N.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2021)