From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruise v. Richardson

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Jan 25, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-00257-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2022)

Opinion

Civil Action 1:21-00257-KD-MU

01-25-2022

HAROLD DAVID CRUISE, Plaintiff, v. MELVIN RICHARDSON, Defendant.


ORDER

KRISTI K. DUBOSE, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and there having been no objections filed, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and dated December 22, 2021 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED that due to Plaintiff's failure to file an amended complaint and to comply with the Court's order, and upon consideration of the available alternatives, this action is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure as no other lesser sanction will suffice; and Plaintiff's motion to proceed without prepayment of fees (Doc. 2) is DENIED as MOOT.


Summaries of

Cruise v. Richardson

United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama
Jan 25, 2022
Civil Action 1:21-00257-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2022)
Case details for

Cruise v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:HAROLD DAVID CRUISE, Plaintiff, v. MELVIN RICHARDSON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Southern District of Alabama

Date published: Jan 25, 2022

Citations

Civil Action 1:21-00257-KD-MU (S.D. Ala. Jan. 25, 2022)