From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cruise Control, Inc. v. Tyler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 10, 1991
577 So. 2d 709 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Summary

reversing final judgment of garnishment where "garnishor failed to provide the defendant . . . with the notice required by section 77.055, Florida Statutes . . . ."

Summary of this case from Patino v. El Rey Del Chivito Corp.

Opinion

No. 90-01292.

April 10, 1991.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Lee County; R. Wallace Pack, Judge.

Dan E. Batchelor and Daren L. Shippy of Batchelor, Shippy Vojak, P.A., Bonita Springs, for appellants.

John Charles Coleman of Coleman Coleman, Fort Myers, for appellee.


We reverse the final judgment of garnishment because the appellee as garnishor failed to provide the defendant, appellant Webber, with the notice required by section 77.055, Florida Statutes (1989). See T-Jett Enterprises, Inc. v. Ernest and Stewart, Inc., 543 So.2d 390 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989).

SCHEB, A.C.J., and FRANK and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Cruise Control, Inc. v. Tyler

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 10, 1991
577 So. 2d 709 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

reversing final judgment of garnishment where "garnishor failed to provide the defendant . . . with the notice required by section 77.055, Florida Statutes . . . ."

Summary of this case from Patino v. El Rey Del Chivito Corp.
Case details for

Cruise Control, Inc. v. Tyler

Case Details

Full title:CRUISE CONTROL, INC., AND ANTHONY WEBBER, APPELLANTS, v. EDWARD L. TYLER…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 10, 1991

Citations

577 So. 2d 709 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1991)

Citing Cases

Regions Bank v. Hyman

Unless due process is accorded to all parties, the Court could not enter a valid final judgment in this…

Patino v. El Rey Del Chivito Corp.

The report and recommendation was subsequently affirmed and adopted by this Court. See Order Affirming and…