From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crudup v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 12, 1989
382 S.E.2d 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)

Opinion

A89A0732.

DECIDED MAY 12, 1989.

Improper passing. Glynn State Court. Before Judge Adams.

John N. Crudup, pro se.

Richard H. Taylor, Solicitor, for appellee.


Defendant appeals from his conviction of improper passing, OCGA § 40-6-42, arguing three enumerations all relating to his sentence.

Defendant was tried before the court and found guilty, granted a motion for new trial, tried by a jury and found guilty. Initially, he was sentenced to 12 months imprisonment, which was suspended, and $59.95 court costs.

The stipulated transcript of evidence of the second trial states: "the judge sentenced the Defendant to a 12 month suspended sentence upon payment of the $750 fine and a $50 statutory assessment."

Defendant contends that this sentence violates the due process principle established in North Carolina v. Pearce, 395 U.S. 711 (89 SC 2072, 23 L.Ed.2d 656) (1969). See Hewell v. State, 238 Ga. 578 ( 234 S.E.2d 497) (1977); Anthony v. Hopper, 235 Ga. 336 ( 219 S.E.2d 413) (1975); Pressley v. State, 158 Ga. App. 638 ( 281 S.E.2d 364) (1981).

There being nothing in the record to explain the additional fine, we are constrained to agree.

The case is remanded for reconsideration of the sentence so that it conforms with the law established in the foregoing cases.

Judgment affirmed with direction. Carley, C. J., and McMurray, P. J., concur.

DECIDED MAY 12, 1989.


Summaries of

Crudup v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia
May 12, 1989
382 S.E.2d 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
Case details for

Crudup v. State

Case Details

Full title:CRUDUP v. THE STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Georgia

Date published: May 12, 1989

Citations

382 S.E.2d 391 (Ga. Ct. App. 1989)
382 S.E.2d 391

Citing Cases

Crudup v. State

DEEN, Presiding Judge. This case previously appeared before this court at 191 Ga. App. 551 ( 382 S.E.2d 391)…

Chambers v. State

The case is remanded for reconsideration of the sentences in conformity with the due process principle…