From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crudup v. Englehart

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 14, 2015
590 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2015)

Opinion

No. 14-7158

01-14-2015

DON CRUDUP, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SGT. ENGLEHART; OFFICER SCHULTE, Defendants - Appellees.

Don Crudup, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.


UNPUBLISHED Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. James K. Bredar, District Judge. (1:13-cv-03479-JKB) Before SHEDD, AGEE, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Don Crudup, Appellant Pro Se. Nichole Cherie Gatewood, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Don Crudup appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Crudup v. Englehart, No. 1:13-cv-03479-JKB (D. Md. filed Oct. 16, 2014; entered Oct. 17, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Crudup v. Englehart

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Jan 14, 2015
590 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2015)
Case details for

Crudup v. Englehart

Case Details

Full title:DON CRUDUP, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. SGT. ENGLEHART; OFFICER SCHULTE…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Jan 14, 2015

Citations

590 F. App'x 226 (4th Cir. 2015)