Opinion
3:10-CV-0082-LRH (VPC)
08-22-2011
JEREMY A. CROZIER, Plaintiff, v. CORTEZ MASTO, et al., Defendants.
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTES OF THE COURT
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK: LISA MANN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Defendants filed a motion for leave to file confidential documents in camera and under seal (#90). No opposition was filed. Pursuant to Local Rule 7-2(d), the failure of an opposing party to file points and authorities in response to any motion shall constitute a consent to the granting of the motion. Therefore,
IT IS ORDERED that defendants' motion for leave to file confidential documents in camera and under seal (#90) is GRANTED. Exhibit C to defendants' opposition to plaintiff's eighth amendment motion for preliminary injunction/restraining order (#92) is filed and shall remain under seal.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LANCE S. WILSON, CLERK
By: __________________
Deputy Clerk