From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crozier v. Masto

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 29, 2010
3: 10-cv-00082-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2010)

Opinion

3: 10-cv-00082-LRH-VPC.

November 29, 2010


ORDER


Plaintiff, who is a prisoner in the custody of the Nevada Department of Corrections, is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 19, 2010, plaintiff filed a motion to hold defendants in contempt of court (#14.) The basis of plaintiff's motion is his claim that defendants have failed to comply with the court's order requiring them to file their mediation form with the court. Plaintiff is mistaken. Defendants filed their form with the court on November 12, 2010 (#10.) Accordingly, plaintiff's motion (#14) is HEREBY DENIED.

DATED: November 24, 2010.


Summaries of

Crozier v. Masto

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Nov 29, 2010
3: 10-cv-00082-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2010)
Case details for

Crozier v. Masto

Case Details

Full title:JEREMY A. CROZIER, Plaintiff, v. CORTEZ MASTO, et al, Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Nov 29, 2010

Citations

3: 10-cv-00082-LRH-VPC (D. Nev. Nov. 29, 2010)