Opinion
Civil Action No. 08-cv-00692-PAB-KLM.
November 17, 2008
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on numerous motions filed by Applicant [Docket Nos. 39, 86, 87, 91, 92, 104, 105, 106, 109, 110, 111, 113, 117, 118, 120, 121, 122, 125, 133, 137 and 138].
The majority of Applicant's Motions [#39, 86, 91, 92, 104, 105, 109, 113, 117, 121, 122, 137 and 138] appear to request further amendment of Applicant's Second Amended Petition for Habeas Corpus [Docket No. 70; Filed July 30, 2008]. The Motions are largely unintelligible. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions [#39, 86, 91, 92, 104, 105, 109, 113, 117, 121, 122, 137 and 138] are DENIED, for the reasons set forth by the Court in its Minute Order dated July 30, 2008 [Docket No. 69] and Order dated August 12, 2008 [Docket No. 84].
In Motions #87 and #106, Applicant requests leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. However, Applicant has already been granted leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 [Docket No. 19; Filed May 21, 2008]. Applicant is directed that it is not necessary to file more than one motion for leave to proceed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions [#87 and 106] are DENIED as moot.
In Motions #110 and #111, Applicant states that he seeks "to Confer by Responce [sic] pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 5(d) Addendume [sic] to Clarify with Councle [sic] Pursuant [sic] Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(d) by Request." In Motion #125, Applicant seeks a "Leave of Absents." In Motion #133, Applicant seeks to "Amend by Attack." The Motions are largely unintelligible, and the Court cannot determine the relief Applicant seeks here. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions [#110, #111, #125 and #133] are STRICKEN as unintelligible.
In Motions #118 and #120, Applicant seeks relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. This statute relates to the jurisdiction of the United States Courts of Appeals, and has no applicability to the action currently before the Court. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motions [#118 and #120] are DENIED.