explaining resulting trust arises when one buys property but it is held in another's name but that "there can be no resulting trust here, where the conveyance was gratuitous and included negligible consideration."
Summary of this case from In re ZecherNo. 05-P-40.
December 2, 2005.
Decision Pursuant to Rule 1:28.
Judgment affirmed.
explaining resulting trust arises when one buys property but it is held in another's name but that "there can be no resulting trust here, where the conveyance was gratuitous and included negligible consideration."
Summary of this case from In re ZecherFull title:JOAN O. CROWLEY vs. ETHEL C. REMILLARD others
Court:Appeals Court of Massachusetts
Date published: Dec 2, 2005
Likewise, the Court is dubious that the Debtor could have prevailed if he had made an argument regarding a…