Opinion
October Term, 1903.
Judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Goodrich, P.J., Bartlett, Woodward, Hirschberg and Hooker, JJ., concurred.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Crowe v. Wilson Baillie Manufacturing Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1903
87 App. Div. 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)
Summaries of
Crowe v. Wilson Baillie Manufacturing Company
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1903
87 App. Div. 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)
Case details for
Crowe v. Wilson Baillie Manufacturing Company
Case Details
Full title:Frank A. Crowe, as Receiver of the Partnership Property of Carroll Lawler…
Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Date published: Oct 1, 1903
Citations
87 App. Div. 613 (N.Y. App. Div. 1903)
Citing Cases
Potomac Edison Co. v. Routzahn
Plaintiffs rely on the right of a tenant to remove "trade fixtures", the analogous right of a licensee upon…
J.W. Perry Co. v. Norfolk" It adopted that part of the language in Wells v. Savannah, 87 Ga. 397, affirmed in 181 U.S. 531, where, in…