From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crowe v. Kane Reg'l Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 21, 2014
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00900 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 21, 2014)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00900

01-21-2014

HOWARD E. CROWE, III, Plaintiff, v. KANE REGIONAL CENTER, Defendant.


District Judge Mark R. Hornak


Chief Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan


MEMORANDUM ORDER

Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Maureen P. Kelly who has recommended that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss be DENIED. The parties were served with the Report and Recommendation and informed that they had until January 3, 2014, to file written objections. As of the date of this Order, no party has filed objections. After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered.

AND NOW, this 21st day of January, 2014,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, ECF No. 3, is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 10) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pretrial proceedings remain referred to Judge Kelly.

________________

Mark R. Hornak

United States District Judge
cc: All Counsel of Record


Summaries of

Crowe v. Kane Reg'l Ctr.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Jan 21, 2014
Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00900 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 21, 2014)
Case details for

Crowe v. Kane Reg'l Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD E. CROWE, III, Plaintiff, v. KANE REGIONAL CENTER, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Jan 21, 2014

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:13-cv-00900 (W.D. Pa. Jan. 21, 2014)

Citing Cases

Sterrett v. Giant Eagle, Inc.

Plaintiff in this case argues that he has met his burden in this regard because the decision to terminate his…