From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crowe v. Evergood Associates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. Civ S-05-1627 FCD PAN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)

Opinion

No. Civ S-05-1627 FCD PAN.

August 3, 2006


ORDER


Defendant's motion to compel discovery responses came on regularly for hearing August 3, 2006. Plaintiff was represented by Charles Jeffrey Fletcher. Susan E. Bishop appeared for defendant. Upon review of the motion and the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of plaintiff and counsel and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT FINDS AS FOLLOWS:

Defendant's motion to compel is granted. Any objections to the discovery requests are waived by virtue of plaintiff's failure to respond. Richmark Corp. v. Timber Falling Consultants, 959 Fed. 2d 1468, 1473 (9th Cir. 1992). Plaintiff shall answer the interrogatories and respond to the request for production of documents; said answers and responses shall be made and served on or before August 17, 2006. Plaintiff's counsel shall pay defendant's counsel her expenses in the amount of $720.00.


Summaries of

Crowe v. Evergood Associates

United States District Court, E.D. California
Aug 3, 2006
No. Civ S-05-1627 FCD PAN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)
Case details for

Crowe v. Evergood Associates

Case Details

Full title:COURTNEY CROWE, Plaintiff, v. EVERGOOD ASSOCIATES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Aug 3, 2006

Citations

No. Civ S-05-1627 FCD PAN (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2006)