From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crosthwaite v. Landavazo Brothers, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, (San Francisco Division)
Feb 16, 2010
CASE NO. C09-5741 TEH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO. C09-5741 TEH.

February 16, 2010

CHARLES S. CUSTER (SBN: 124270), DANIEL T. BERKLEY (SBN: 50111), JON C. YONEMITSU (SBN: 199026), GORDON REES LLP, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Defendant, LANDAVAZO BROTHERS, INC.

MURIEL B. KAPLAN, ESQ. (SBN 124607), MICHELE R. STAFFORD, ESQ. (SBN 172509), SALTZMAN JOHNSON LAW CORPORATION, San Francisco, CA, Attorneys for Plaintiffs, GIL CROSTHWAITE and RUSS BURNS, in their respective capacities as Trustees of the OPERATING ENGINEERS' HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, PENSIONED OPERATING ENGINEERS' HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS PRE-APPRENTICESHIP, APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMEN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TRAINING FUND, HEAVY AND HIGHWAY COMMITTEE; and OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 3.


JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND TO RESCHEDULE INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE; [PROPOSED] ORDER


This Stipulation to Extend the Time to Respond to the Complaint and to Reschedule the Initial Case Management Conference is entered into by and between Plaintiffs GIL CROSTHWAITE and RUSS BURNS, in their respective capacities as Trustees of the OPERATING ENGINEERS' HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, PENSION TRUST FUND FOR OPERATING ENGINEERS, PENSIONED OPERATING ENGINEERS' HEALTH AND WELFARE TRUST FUND, OPERATING ENGINEERS AND PARTICIPATING EMPLOYERS PRE-APPRENTICESHIP, APPRENTICE AND JOURNEYMEN AFFIRMATIVE ACTION TRAINING FUND, HEAVY AND HIGHWAY COMMITTEE; and OPERATING ENGINEERS LOCAL 3 and Defendant LANDAVAZO BROTHERS, INC. by and through their respective counsel with respect to the following:

1. WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Complaint on December 7, 2009. Defendant accepted service by Waiver of Summons on January 13, 2010.

2. WHEREAS, defendant's time to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint expires on February 15, 2010.

3. WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Rule 6-1(a), the parties to this litigation stipulate to an extension of time for defendant to file a responsive pleading to Plaintiffs' Complaint;

4. WHEREAS, this litigation involves ERISA claims of unpaid wages and deficient employer contributions to a union's pension trust fund over a four (4) year period;

5. WHEREAS, the parties have had fruitful ongoing discussions regarding the merits of this action in the hopes of achieving an early resolution with the intent of settling of this matter thereby eliminating the need for protracted litigation;

6. WHEREAS, the parties agree that providing Defendant with additional time to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint will be beneficial towards achieving an early resolution of this matter;

7. WHEREAS, the parties stipulate to a 45-day extension of time to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint, or until April 2, 2010;

8. WHEREAS, in the interest of judicial economy and their effort to minimize litigation expenses for the parties, the parties further stipulate to reschedule the Initial Case Management Conference currently set for March 15, 2010, to Monday, May 3, 2010;

9. WHEREAS, as the proposed Stipulation affects the currently set Case Management dates, the parties further stipulate that the Court modify its Order Setting Initial Case Management Conference and ADR Deadlines as follows:

Event Current Proposed Date Date

Defendant's Responsive pleading due 2/15/2010 4/2/2010 Last day to: 2/22/2010 4/9/2010 • meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan • file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) • file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures 3/8/2010 4/23/2010 or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement per attached Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement (also available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE(CMC) in Courtroom 12, 19th Fl., SF at 1:30 PM 3/15/2010 5/3/2010

Whereas, the parties agree that they will not suffer any prejudice by agreeing to the alternative dates set forth above.

SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Pursuant to the stipulation of the Parties, good cause appearing therefore, the following dates for the Initial Case Management Conference hearing and associated ADR Initial Order are extended as follows: Event Current Proposed Date Date Defendant's Responsive pleading due 2/15/2010 4/2/2010 Last day to: 2/22/2010 4/9/2010 • meet and confer re: initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan • file ADR Certification signed by Parties and Counsel (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) • file either Stipulation to ADR Process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference (form available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) Last day to file Rule 26(f) Report, complete initial disclosures 3/8/2010 4/23/2010 or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report and file Case Management Statement per attached Standing Order re Contents of Joint Case Management Statement (also available at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov) INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE (CMC) in 3/15/2010 5/3/2010 Courtroom 12, 19th Fl., SF at 1:30 PM IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Crosthwaite v. Landavazo Brothers, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, (San Francisco Division)
Feb 16, 2010
CASE NO. C09-5741 TEH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Crosthwaite v. Landavazo Brothers, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:GIL CROSTHWAITE and RUSS BURNS, in their respective capacities as Trustees…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, (San Francisco Division)

Date published: Feb 16, 2010

Citations

CASE NO. C09-5741 TEH (N.D. Cal. Feb. 16, 2010)