From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crosthwaite v. a & J Pumping, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Nov 4, 2011
No. C 10-3040 SBA (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)

Opinion

No. C 10-3040 SBA (MEJ)

11-04-2011

F.G. CROSTHWAITE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. A & J PUMPING, INC. and/or A & T PUMPING, INC., Defendant.


ORDER RE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING

Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' F.G. Crosthwaite and Russell E. Burns Motion for Default Judgment. Dkt. No. 25. In their Motion, Plaintiffs seek an award of attorneys' fees and costs. In Kaplan's Declaration and Supplement Declaration, the attorney's and paralegal's time is 76.6 hours. Dkt. Nos. 27, 35. However, in the Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law, the hours differ: (1) 77.7 hours on page 8 of the document; and (2) 72.7 on page 10 of the billing chart. Dkt. 34. In order to enable the Court to assess the reasonableness of the time and tasks billed, the Court HEREBY ORDERS Plaintiffs to submit copies of each attorney's and paralegal's time records for review. Plaintiffs shall also identify in the billing records any hours reduced or cut from the requested amount in their motion. Plaintiffs shall submit the time records no later than November 8, 2011 at 10:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Maria-Elena James

Chief United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Crosthwaite v. a & J Pumping, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California
Nov 4, 2011
No. C 10-3040 SBA (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)
Case details for

Crosthwaite v. a & J Pumping, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:F.G. CROSTHWAITE, et al., Plaintiffs, v. A & J PUMPING, INC. and/or A & T…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Northern District of California

Date published: Nov 4, 2011

Citations

No. C 10-3040 SBA (MEJ) (N.D. Cal. Nov. 4, 2011)