From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cross v. Smith's Food & Drug

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 2, 2022
2:22-cv-01346-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 2, 2022)

Opinion

2:22-cv-01346-APG-NJK

11-02-2022

SHAWN CROSS, Plaintiff, v. SMITH'S FOOD AND DRUG, Defendant


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CASE [ECF NO. 5]

On September 20, 2022, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Shawn Cross's complaint because this court lacks subject matter jurisdiction over this case. ECF No. 5. Cross filed an objection. ECF No. 7.

I have conducted a de novo review of the issues as required by Local Rule IB 3-2. As Judge Koppe points out, the complaint does not provide a sufficient basis for federal question jurisdiction. And Cross's objection likewise fails to demonstrate how a federal question is at issue in this dispute. Judge Koppe's Report and Recommendation sets forth the proper legal analysis and factual basis for the decision, and I accept and adopt it as my own. Cross may pursue his claims in state court, but jurisdiction is lacking in this federal court.

I THEREFORE ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) is accepted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of the court shall close this case.


Summaries of

Cross v. Smith's Food & Drug

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Nov 2, 2022
2:22-cv-01346-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 2, 2022)
Case details for

Cross v. Smith's Food & Drug

Case Details

Full title:SHAWN CROSS, Plaintiff, v. SMITH'S FOOD AND DRUG, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Nov 2, 2022

Citations

2:22-cv-01346-APG-NJK (D. Nev. Nov. 2, 2022)