From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cross v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Oct 16, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-03700 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 16, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-03700

10-16-2020

CONNIE CROSS, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

On October 2, 2020, I entered an order directing plaintiff to show cause on or before October 15, 2020, why her case should not be dismissed without prejudice as to the remaining defendants, Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc., pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Plaintiff has not shown cause. The court ORDERS that plaintiff's case must be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) for failure to serve the remaining defendants within 90 days after the complaint was filed.

The court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.

ENTER: October 16, 2020

/s/_________

JOSEPH R. GOODWIN

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Cross v. Johnson & Johnson

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION
Oct 16, 2020
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-03700 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 16, 2020)
Case details for

Cross v. Johnson & Johnson

Case Details

Full title:CONNIE CROSS, Plaintiff, v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION

Date published: Oct 16, 2020

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:17-cv-03700 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 16, 2020)