Cross v. Covello

Full title: QUINTIN R. CROSS, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, et al., Defendants.

Court: United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Aug 3, 2023

2:23-cv-0336 KJM CKD P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 3, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-0336 KJM CKD P

08-03-2023

QUINTIN R. CROSS, Plaintiff, v. PATRICK COVELLO, et al., Defendants.

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

By order filed April 6, 2023, plaintiff's complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and the time for doing so has expired. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9^th Cir. 1991).