From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cross v. Brazil

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 24, 2023
2:21-cv-0766 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2023)

Opinion

2:21-cv-0766 CKD P

10-24-2023

QUINTIN R. CROSS, Plaintiff, v. BRAZIL, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE.

Defendants have filed a motion asking that the court compel plaintiff to respond to defendant Tsushko's requests for production of documents and interrogatories 1-14 and 22. Plaintiff has not responded to the motion.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff file a response to defendants' motion to compel within 30 days.

2. Plaintiff's failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed under Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for failure to follow court orders.


Summaries of

Cross v. Brazil

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Oct 24, 2023
2:21-cv-0766 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2023)
Case details for

Cross v. Brazil

Case Details

Full title:QUINTIN R. CROSS, Plaintiff, v. BRAZIL, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Oct 24, 2023

Citations

2:21-cv-0766 CKD P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 24, 2023)