From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cross v. Braman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 30, 2008
973 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 3D07-1334.

December 19, 2007. Rehearing Denied January 30, 2008.

A non-final appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Maria Espinosa Dennis, Judge.

Stabinski Funt, Miami; Lawrence Daniel and Adam Lawrence, Miami, for appellant.

Richard A. Sherman Sr., Fort Lauderdale; Bohdan Neswiacheny, Orange Park, for appellee.

Before COPE, WELLS and SALTER, JJ.


Angelo Cross appeals from an order submitting to arbitration his malicious prosecution action against his employer, Braman Motors, Inc. We reverse.

While the parties' contract mandates arbitration for virtually all claims, it expressly excludes those brought under the workers' compensation laws. Since the instant claim for malicious prosecution stems directly from Braman's actions during the workers' compensation case, it is not arbitrable under the parties' agreement.

A sample of the employment-related claims listed as subject to arbitration include those under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Equal Pay Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Family Medical Leave Act, the Older Worker's Benefits Protection Act, as well as all other federal, state and local employment-related laws, regulations, rules or theories.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.


Summaries of

Cross v. Braman

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Jan 30, 2008
973 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Cross v. Braman

Case Details

Full title:Angelo CROSS, Appellant, v. BRAMAN MOTORS, INC., Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Jan 30, 2008

Citations

973 So. 2d 517 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)