From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Cross v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
May 7, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-0998 (SDW) (D.N.J. May. 7, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-0998 (SDW)

05-07-2013

RICHARD CROSS, Plaintiff, v. SHANTAY BRAME ADAMS, et al, Defendants.


ORDER


ORDER ADOPTING THE REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation ("R&R") of United States Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo filed April 19, 2012, regarding Defendants' Johnson, Lorana, Long, and Datz (collectively "Defendants") Motion to Dismiss the Complaint filed by pro se Plaintiff Richard Cross ("Plaintiff"). No objections to the R&R have been filed.

The Court has reviewed the R&R and related documents on file in this matter. Based on the foregoing, and for good cause shown,

IT IS, on this 7th day of May, 2013,

ORDERED that the R&R of Magistrate Judge Arleo is ADOPTED by this Court; and it is further

ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED; and it is further

ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint be DISMISSED with prejudice.

SO ORDERED.

Susan D. Wigenton, U.S.D.J. cc: Magistrate Judge Madeline C. Arleo


Summaries of

Cross v. Adams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
May 7, 2013
Civil Action No. 11-0998 (SDW) (D.N.J. May. 7, 2013)
Case details for

Cross v. Adams

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD CROSS, Plaintiff, v. SHANTAY BRAME ADAMS, et al, Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY

Date published: May 7, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-0998 (SDW) (D.N.J. May. 7, 2013)