From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crosby Valve, LLC v. FMC Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Apr 23, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-2790 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2015)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-2790

04-23-2015

CROSBY VALVE, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR TO CROSBY VALVE, INC. Plaintiff, v. FMC CORPORATION Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING FMC CORPORATION'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND ENTERING FINAL JUDGMENT

FMC Corporation filed a motion to dismiss this suit, in which Crosby Valve, LLC seeks indemnification from FMC. (Docket Entry No. 13). The court has considered the pleadings, the motion and the response, the parties' submissions, the applicable law, and the arguments counsel made at the hearing on January 12, 2015. At that hearing, the court granted the motion. For the reasons stated on the record at that hearing, Crosby's objections to FMC's proposed form of judgment, (Docket Entry No. 33), are overruled, and this order of final judgment is entered.

The parties' Agreement requires Crosby Valve, LLC ("Crosby") to be an Affiliate of Guarantor, Tyco International Ltd. ("Tyco"), when Crosby seeks indemnification from Tyco. The term "Affiliate" is defined in the Agreement as an entity owned or controlled by the Guarantor. The term "Affiliate" is unambiguous. As of September 28, 2012, Crosby was no longer owned or controlled by Tyco. Crosby was not an "Affiliate" of Tyco as of September 28, 2012.

For that reason, and for the other reasons stated on the record at the January 12, 2015 hearing, as a matter of law, Crosby is not entitled to indemnification from FMC for any losses or expenses paid or incurred arising out of claims involving Crosby's asbestos liability, if Crosby sought indemnification from FMC for those claims on or after September 28, 2012. Crosby is not entitled to a declaratory judgment that it is entitled to indemnification for any claims asserted against Crosby that it submitted, or submits, to FMC for indemnification on or after September 28, 2012.

FMC's motion to dismiss, (Docket Entry No. 13), is GRANTED. Crosby's complaint for breach of contract and declaratory judgment, (Docket Entry No. 1), is DISMISSED with prejudice.

This is a final judgment.

SIGNED on April 23, 2015, at Houston, Texas.

/s/_________

Lee H. Rosenthal

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Crosby Valve, LLC v. FMC Corp.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION
Apr 23, 2015
CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-2790 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2015)
Case details for

Crosby Valve, LLC v. FMC Corp.

Case Details

Full title:CROSBY VALVE, LLC, AS SUCCESSOR TO CROSBY VALVE, INC. Plaintiff, v. FMC…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION

Date published: Apr 23, 2015

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. H-14-2790 (S.D. Tex. Apr. 23, 2015)