From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crosby v. Tampa Electric Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 8, 1966
187 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1966)

Opinion

No. 35129.

June 8, 1966.

Writ of Certiorari to Florida Industrial Commission.

Morrice S. Uman, Tampa, for petitioner.

Rodney Durrance and John McQuigg, of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos Evans, Tampa, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 7 February 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

Petition for attorney's fees also is denied.

THOMAS, Acting C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O'CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Crosby v. Tampa Electric Company

Supreme Court of Florida
Jun 8, 1966
187 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1966)
Case details for

Crosby v. Tampa Electric Company

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM A. CROSBY, PETITIONER, v. TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY, GLOBE INDEMNITY…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jun 8, 1966

Citations

187 So. 2d 341 (Fla. 1966)