From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crosby v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 2, 2010
No. 2: 05-cv-0447 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2: 05-cv-0447 GEB KJN P.

December 2, 2010


ORDER


On November 1, 2010, the Honorable Garland E. Burrell denied petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus and issued a certificate of appealability.

On November 17, 2010, petitioner filed an application for a certificate of appealability which the court construes as a notice of appeal. On November 17, 2010, petitioner filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Because this action is now on appeal, this motion should be addressed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Petitioner's motion for certificate of appealability (Dkt. No. 70) is construed as a notice of appeal; the Clerk of the Court shall process petitioner's appeal;

2. Petitioner's motion for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 71) is disregarded.

DATED: December 1, 2010


Summaries of

Crosby v. Schwartz

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 2, 2010
No. 2: 05-cv-0447 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2010)
Case details for

Crosby v. Schwartz

Case Details

Full title:COURTNEY CROSBY, Petitioner, v. T. SCHWARTZ, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 2, 2010

Citations

No. 2: 05-cv-0447 GEB KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 2, 2010)