From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crosby v. San Juan Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Mar 29, 2022
CV 21-00899 RB/KRS (D.N.M. Mar. 29, 2022)

Opinion

CV 21-00899 RB/KRS

03-29-2022

ERIC DOUGLAS CROSBY, Plaintiff, v. SAN JUAN COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER, et al., Defendants.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

THIS MATTER is before the Court sua sponte. Plaintiff Eric Douglas Crosby is an incarcerated prisoner. He filed a complaint on September 13, 2021. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff Crosby also submitted an application to proceed under § 1915 on September 13, 2021. (Doc. 2). The Court granted the application to proceed in forma pauperis on January 28, 2022. (Doc. 7). The Court also required Plaintiff Crosby to make an initial partial payment of $28.33 or show cause why he should not be required to make the payment within 30 days of entry of the Order. (Doc. 7 at 1). Plaintiff Crosby did not make the initial partial payment and did not respond to the Court's January 28, 2022, Order.

More than 30 days has elapsed since entry of the January 28, 2022, Order and Plaintiff Crosby has not paid the $28.33 initial partial payment or shown cause why he should be relieved of the obligation to pay. When a prisoner is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis, § 1915 provides:

“The court shall assess and, when funds exist, collect, as a partial payment of any court fees required by law, an initial partial filing fee of 20 percent of the greater of (A) the average monthly deposits to the prisoner's account; or (B) the average monthly balance in the prisoner's account for the 6-month
period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint or notice of appeal.”
28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) (emphasis added). Plaintiff Crosby was ordered to make the required partial payment under § 1915(b)(1) or show cause why the payment should be excused but has failed to comply with the Court's Order.

The Court may dismiss an action under Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) for failure to prosecute, to comply with the rules of civil procedure, or to comply with court orders. See Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204, n.3 (10th Cir. 2003). The Court will require Plaintiff Crosby to show cause, within 30 days of entry of this Order, why this action should not be dismissed for non-compliance with the Court's January 28, 2022, Order. Failure to show cause or otherwise respond to this Order may result in dismissal of this case without further notice.

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Eric Douglas Crosby show cause, within 30 days of entry of this Order, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with the Court's January 28, 2022, Order.


Summaries of

Crosby v. San Juan Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.

United States District Court, District of New Mexico
Mar 29, 2022
CV 21-00899 RB/KRS (D.N.M. Mar. 29, 2022)
Case details for

Crosby v. San Juan Cnty. Adult Det. Ctr.

Case Details

Full title:ERIC DOUGLAS CROSBY, Plaintiff, v. SAN JUAN COUNTY ADULT DETENTION CENTER…

Court:United States District Court, District of New Mexico

Date published: Mar 29, 2022

Citations

CV 21-00899 RB/KRS (D.N.M. Mar. 29, 2022)