From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crooms v. City of Daytona Beach Risk Management

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Jun 16, 2010
Case No. 6:10-cv-438-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Jun. 16, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 6:10-cv-438-Orl-31DAB.

June 16, 2010


ORDER


On May 28, 2010, Magistrate Judge Baker entered a Report and Recommendation (Doc. 10), recommending that Plaintiff's Motion to Appear In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 9) be DENIED. Plaintiff filed timely objections to the Report (Doc. 11). Upon de novo review of the above, the Court concurs with the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge. It is, therefore

ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge is Adopted and Confirmed;

2. Plaintiff's Motion to Appear In Forma Pauperis (Doc. 9) is DENIED, and the Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk is directed to close the file.

DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida.


Summaries of

Crooms v. City of Daytona Beach Risk Management

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Jun 16, 2010
Case No. 6:10-cv-438-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Jun. 16, 2010)
Case details for

Crooms v. City of Daytona Beach Risk Management

Case Details

Full title:HOSEA CROOMS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH RISK MANAGEMENT, AND…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Jun 16, 2010

Citations

Case No. 6:10-cv-438-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Jun. 16, 2010)