From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Crooms v. City of Daytona Beach Risk Management

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Apr 13, 2010
Case No. 6:10-cv-438-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Apr. 13, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 6:10-cv-438-Orl-31DAB.

April 13, 2010


ORDER


This cause comes before the Court on Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Doc. No. 2) filed March 23, 2010.

On March 26, 2010, the United States Magistrate Judge issued a report (Doc. No. 3) recommending that the motion be denied. No objections have been filed. Therefore, it is ORDERED as follows:

1. The Report and Recommendation is CONFIRMED and ADOPTED as part of this Order.

2. The Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis is DENIED.

3. The Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction as stated in the Report and Recommendation. The Plaintiff will have 14 days from the date of this order to file an Amended Complaint accompanied by either the filing fee or a renewed motion to proceed as a pauper. Failure to comply with this order will result in the case being closed without further action. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers, Orlando, Florida


Summaries of

Crooms v. City of Daytona Beach Risk Management

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division
Apr 13, 2010
Case No. 6:10-cv-438-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Apr. 13, 2010)
Case details for

Crooms v. City of Daytona Beach Risk Management

Case Details

Full title:HOSEA CROOMS, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF DAYTONA BEACH RISK MANAGEMENT, AND…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Orlando Division

Date published: Apr 13, 2010

Citations

Case No. 6:10-cv-438-Orl-31DAB (M.D. Fla. Apr. 13, 2010)