From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Croom v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 11, 2023
No. 22-CV-3817 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2023)

Opinion

22-CV-3817

10-11-2023

DEREK T. CROOM, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

MITCHELL S. GOLDBERG, J.

AND NOW, this 11th day of October, 2023, upon consideration of Plaintiff Derek T. Croom's pro se Amended Complaint (ECF No. 17), his Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 20), and his requests for entry of default (ECF Nos. 18, 19, 21), it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. Croom's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE for failure to state a claim pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) for the reasons stated in my accompanying Memorandum Opinion.
2. Croom's Motion for Appointment of Counsel is DENIED.
3. Croom's requests seeking the entry of default are DENIED AS MOOT.
4. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to CLOSE this case.


Summaries of

Croom v. City of Philadelphia

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 11, 2023
No. 22-CV-3817 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2023)
Case details for

Croom v. City of Philadelphia

Case Details

Full title:DEREK T. CROOM, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 11, 2023

Citations

No. 22-CV-3817 (E.D. Pa. Oct. 11, 2023)