Crooker v. Crooker

2 Citing cases

  1. Noel v. Scholastic Sols., LLC

    No. 343580 (Mich. Ct. App. Oct. 10, 2019)

    We are unpersuaded. An action for an accounting is equitable in nature, Crooker v Crooker, 340 Mich 250, 251; 65 NW2d 767 (1954), and "we review equitable issues de novo," Sys Soft Technologies, LLC v Artemis Technologies, Inc, 301 Mich App 642, 650; 837 NW2d 449 (2013). Noel cites MCL 450.4503(5) to support his argument that the trial court improperly denied his request for an accounting.

  2. Wentzel v. Hutchison

    122 N.W.2d 80 (Mich. 1963)   Cited 1 times

    In subtracting the plaintiffs' cash drawings of $2,396 and 1/3 of the cost of plaintiffs' meals of $1,287 — a total of $3,683 — from plaintiffs' share of the profits, an overpayment of $33.85 results. This Court, in a chancery accounting suit, hears the matter de novo. Crooker v. Crooker, 340 Mich. 250. We have so examined the record.